Shy of the April 60th anniversary of Watson and
Crick revolutionary paper which explained the ‘double helix’ DNA structure, Cambridge
researchers have yet again rewritten how we understand the world around us. The University of Cambridge’s Department of
Chemistry and Cambridge Research Institute, led by Giulia Biffi, was the group
researching for the past ten years to prove the “existence of four-stranded ‘quadruple
helix’ DNA structures – known as G-quadruples (in the human genome).”
So what does this mean for the future expansion in
understanding the human genome?
Well, personally, I am skeptical
about the ability to write the human genome for under 1 K if scientists are
STILL finding additional regions of DNA.
Even though, for the past 60
years the structure has been “solved” scientists are proving that DNA is not as
“easily” structured as initially thought.
Some of this development clearly relate to the improvement of technology
as well as techniques in the lab involving understanding the DNA
structure. Originally the qaudruplex was
found in a test tube, a vacuum, and was considered not to be a feature founded
in nature or in living human cells.
Scientists believe that
G-quadruples occur when a cell rapidly reproduces – a cancerous cell –possibly. By linking this feature, scientists can
target the cells to hopefully cure cancer.
They would like to use the unusual structure of the G-DNA to trap tumorous
cells as they see a connection and opportunity to have the ability to stop
these cells from dividing.
However, I also understand that the
general public cannot truly grasp what a quadruple helix in someone’s DNA
exactly means. The Race for the Double
Helix, a 1987 TV movie, document Watson and Crick’s race to unlock the secret
structure of DNA. I feel like this
showcases the lack of public understanding of science. The public really does not care for figured
it out nor do they grasp the political undercurrents and tension that stems
from scientific discoveries. With the
basic public understanding of science plus I feel that social norms might
reject the manipulation of one’s DNA, just like the mosquitoes in the “Mosquito
Solution” article, because the impacts are unknown. I understand that the alternative attempts to
cure cancer are not really having been shot done as the families are usually
willing to try anything.
All in all, it is incredible to comprehend
the possible outcomes by this discovery and what that can mean for the future
of cancer treatment, other applications for life and how or if the social culture
changes with this advancement in both science and technology.
Researchers have shown that four-stranded 'quadruple helix' DNA structures -- known as G-quadruplexes -- exist within the human genome. (Credit: Jean-Paul Rodriguez and Giulia Biffi) |
I have been following this story very closely. As you will see in the next few weeks, this story relates to an important issue in STS, namely what it means to know something. For a long time, the double helix seemed like a dependable, even certain thing, but now that is called into question and we can at least say, "Well, it's more complicated than that." Then the question is, well, what is it to *know* something? And what is the best kind of knowledge we can hope for?
ReplyDelete